What an unbelievable tragedy. Below is the top 10 ranking for NBA franchises (see complete list here). Can someone please explain how the SPURS are ranked ahead of the BULLS?!?!? Hopefully John Hollinger’s editor is yelling at him right now. Check the stats below and you be the judge.
No. 1: Los Angeles Lakers
No. 2: Boston Celtics
No. 3: San Antonio Spurs
No. 4: Chicago Bulls
No. 5: Phoenix Suns
No. 6: Philadelphia 76ers
No. 7: Utah Jazz
No. 8: Portland Trail Blazers
No. 9: Indiana Pacers
No. 10: Houston Rockets
3. SAN ANTONIO SPURS: 62.05 POINTS PER SEASON (1967-2009)
|
|
Wins: 1,935 |
All-Stars: 60 |
4. CHICAGO BULLS: 59.77 POINTS PER SEASON (1966-2009)
|
|
Wins: 1,744 |
Best player: Michael Jordan |
Enjoy This Post?
Similar Posts:
- 2009 NBA Mock Draft - UPDATED
- Should Pau Gasol have dunked at the end of Game 4?
- NY Fan vs Rocky, The Denver Nuggets Mascot
- Who is Joey Buss?
- Deray Davis: NBA All-Star Comedy Jam
June 11th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
Is this list supposed to be all-time?! The Knicks don’t even make the top 10?! Wack.
June 12th, 2009 at 7:09 am
Yes, this is supposed to be all-time and the Knicks come in at #16 (behind the Utah Jazz, Milwaukee Bucks and Oklahoma City Thunder). Hollinger should be pan-handling outside ESPN HQ in Bristol, CT by now.
June 12th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
The Spurs have won 4 of the last 9 championships and have had more recent success than the Bulls, but the Bulls won 6 ships with MJ. The Bulls were crap before Michael, but so were the Spurs. Advantage Bulls. 6>4. Hollinger = idiot.
Plus, will someone please tell me how the Phoenix Suns check in at No. 5? Wow.
June 12th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
Not to mention Spurs = most boring team ever. Period.
Also, Spurs v. Nets = worst Finals series ever by far.